No Justice

Today, the so-called US “justice” system found all ten of the “Irvine 11” Muslim students “guilty” on misdemeanor charges of conspiring to disrupt and then disrupting a speech delivered by Israeli ambassador Michael Oren at the University of California, Irvine  in February 2010. Two days ago, Troy Davis, a black man accused of killing a white police officer, was murdered by the State of Georgia, despite the overwhelming doubt surrounding his guilt.  A day later, activists highlighted on a 2008 case where a white man and confessed murderer named Samuel David Crowe was pardoned by the same Georgia Parole Board only hours before his scheduled execution.  I am utterly disgusted by the racism evident in these cases.

Some are saying these are sad days for the American “justice” system, but the disturbing reality is that racialized and economically disadvantaged people are constantly targeted and victimized by the system. According to a 2009 report released by the Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS), black men had an incarceration rate of 4,749 inmates per 100,000 US residents, a rate more than six times higher than white men (1,822 inmates per 100,000 US residents).  Black women, with an incarceration rate of 333 per 100,000, were over 3.6 times more likely to have been in prison than white women. Amnesty International research, as reported by Colorlines, shows that death sentences are more likely to be handed out when victims are white. This repulsive racist double-standard can be seen in the 2009 murder of Oscar Grant, where a white cop, Johaness Mehserle, shot an unarmed black man and only served less than one year in prison.

In the Irvine 11 case, the horrible criminalization of these students only occurred because they were Muslim.  The Islamophobia engrained in mainstream American politics, media, and society only creates a larger obstacle for the students who were non-violently protesting and speaking out against something the US President never dares to do: Israel’s war crimes, genocide, and sexual violence against Palestinians. Sami Kishawi of “Sixteen Minutes to Palestine” contends that another verdict was reached in the Irvine 11 case:

The court’s decision complements traditional American policy towards Israel and its supporters. The excuse that Israel is forever under existential threat has embedded itself within the framework of the Constitution of the United States. First Amendment rights are no longer guaranteed if an individual is tried for being on the wrong side: for not supporting Israel’s policies in the Middle East, its occupation, its abandonment of the most fundamental form of justice, or its perception of public nonviolent dissent as institutionalized death-wishing festivities. So in a very obvious sense, the verdict is that Israel’s interests stand above the right to express, to speak, to engage, and to openly challenge the injustices confirmed by Oren’s words.

It would be a terrible mistake to overlook the connection between US-Israel complicity in the violence committed against Palestinians and the way Muslims, Arabs, South Asians, and others are demonized and discriminated against in the United States.  Defending the rights of Muslims in the United States is intertwined with the struggle against the war machine that needs propaganda, racism, and sexism to fuel and justify its imperialist projects.  White supremacy makes it awfully challenging for the white non-Muslim mainstream to identify with the Muslim students who protested Michael Oren’s speech, regardless of how courageous and admirable they are.  Israel, Michael Oren, and the Zionist supporters are the white heroes in this masculinist narrative, where they are depicted as “victims” of the “dark” and “barbaric” invaders.  They’ve asserted themselves as upholders of “democracy,” freedom, and equal rights for all, especially for women, whereas the “dark” male villain is the over-sexed, savage, and destructive one.  Through racialization, the Muslim, no matter how outnumbered or oppressed, is cast as the “dark Other” who is the mortal enemy of the white hero.  As bell hooks describes:

The notion, originally from myth and fable, is that the summit of masculinity – the ‘white hero’ – achieves his manhood, first and foremost, by winning victory over the ‘dark beast’ over the barbarian beasts of other – in some sense ‘darker’ – races, nations and social castes… In our actual lives the imperialist white-supremacist policies of our government lead to enactments of rituals of white-male violent domination of a darker universe, as in both the Gulf War and the most recent war against Iraq. By making it appear that the threatening masculinity – the rapist, the terrorist, the murderer – is really a dark other, white male patriarchs are able to deflect attention away from their own misogyny, from their violence against women and children.

When the entire Muslim community is demonized, the Irvine 11 students are not seen as human beings.  Their “foreign” cultures and religion are “backwards” and “oppressive,” and the only hope they have is for western imperial masculinity to “liberate” them and force them to “assimilate.”  They are “foreign” bodies from societies that behead, torture, veil, molest, and rape men and women, whereas western society is “civilized,” “liberating,” and “free.”  Concealed from this racist socialization is the way Israel and the United States constantly carries out bombing, murder, sexual violence, and economic exploitation against racialized bodies outside and within their borders.  Consider Anushay Hossain’s point about the way Afghan women are used as “emotional tools” in US propaganda to justify its military invasion and occupation of Afghanistan. The US claim is to “liberate,” but there is nothing liberating about bombing, shooting, and raping Afghan women.

The point here is that US and Israeli war crimes are tied to their domestic State violence and corrupt “justice” systems.  If nations are willing to mercilessly and shamelessly kill, torture, and rape other human beings around the world, then what’s to stop them from targeting their “own” citizens?  What’s sad and quite unsettling about Troy Davis’ case is that he was not a victim of an “unfortunate mistake” nor was his unjust execution an “isolated incident.”  The problem is with the so-called criminal “justice” system itself.  Racialized communities, particularly Native and African American communities, have been long victimized by police brutality and other forms of State violence that is ignored, dismissed, and/or sanctioned by the criminal “justice” system. Troy Davis himself pointed this out in his message to supporters:

There are so many more Troy Davis’. This fight to end the death penalty is not won or lost through me but through our strength to move forward and save every innocent person in captivity around the globe. We need to dismantle this unjust system city by city, state by state and country by country.

Indigenous women in particular have long fought and still fight the “justice” system’s complicity in the injustice they face. As pointed out by Andrea Smith, Native anti-violence advocates have reported that rape cases rarely reach the federal courts.  Smith elaborates further:

Complicating matters, cases involving rapes on tribal land were generally handed to the local US attorney, who then declined to prosecute the vast majority of cases.  By the time tribal law enforcement programs even see rape cases, a year may have passed since the assault, making it difficult for these programs to prosecute.

Smith also talks about the negative reputation police officers have in Native communities due to countless cases of police brutality.  When law enforcement and “justice” systems are not only suspect of communities of color, but also violent, discriminatory, racist, and sexist against them,  how does it expect to build trust?  I already mentioned the NYPD and CIA infiltrating and spying on Muslim communities in my previous post.  The injustices we have seen in this week, as well as the oppression we are being informed about by brothers and sisters in other communities, should prompt us to challenge the criminal “justice” system.  When cases for Troy Davis, Irvine 11, and others are fought, it is not only a fight against their injustices, but also against the racism, sexism, classism, ableism, etc. that infects the system and society at large.  Andrea Smith proposes restorative justice efforts which “involve parties (perpetrators, victims, and community members) in determining the appropriate response to a crime in an effort to restore the community to wholeness.”

While I am saddened, disturbed, and angry by the injustice this week, I took a moment to think about all of the people who went out to demonstrate, to protest, to support, to Love, to cry, and to pray.  As I checked the updates on my phone from work, I saw that other people were doing the same. I noticed all of the people on my Facebook posting status updates and messages of support for Troy Davis and Irvine 11.  When I saw pictures or read reports of people crying after the unjust verdicts, I cried too.  It is that longing and drive for justice that connects us.  The solidarity is heartening and to know that other people feel the same way is important. To know that these people and your friends will always fight is important.

May Allah, the Most High and Compassionate, help us unite our struggles and grant us all justice.

14 thoughts on “No Justice

  1. I just saw this! Thank you for writing about it. Sadly it’s only evidence of a deeper systematic problem. Although, the comments on the article are uplifting for once. Everyone has to admit this is outrageous! The Irvine 11 did nothing except what was expected–asking questions and demanding that a leader take responsibility for his actions and answer for them. Seriously, was he expecting hugs and cupcakes?

    1. Thanks! Haha, I know, hugs and cupcakes are the last thing you’ll get when you’re representing a State that is constantly oppressing an entire group of people! When I watch the video of the Irvine 11 students speaking out during Oren’s speech, I can’t believe that such protest is criminalized. Even though they were outnumbered, they are treated as “threatening subhumans.” It goes to show, as bell hooks says, that fighting against injustice is rarely a safe thing to do. Countless men and women put themselves in danger when fighting oppression.

      Mainstream America loves watching Hollywood movies about innocent people being wronged by the system and then fighting for their freedom, but when it happens to Muslims in real life, the system is “right.” Then again, Muslims are victimized by Hollywood’s demonizing depictions, fitting them into that “white hero” versus “dark other” narrative.

  2. If anyone till today has doubt that Islamophobia was just a myth then really this should help them make their minds up. Too often (since 9/11) have we seen examples of Islamophobia in action in the western world. The worst element of it is the media engineering terminology to convince the masses against Islam by planting false news.

  3. I just wish they had waited for Q&A time, and asked a lot more questions 🙂 It is rude ot interrupt a speaker, but not a crime.

    1. It’s funny you mentioned that because Michael Oren couldn’t stay for the Q&A session since he had to rush to the LA Lakers game!

      According to one of the attorneys, the total amount of time for all of the interruptions combined was about one minute. I don’t have a problem with the way the students protested (college students do it all the time). Regardless of the difference of opinion some may have, “interrupting” a speech is not a crime, as you said.

  4. Oh yes, Muslims are poor, innocent, persecuted people and the rest of the world is evil.

    No, the Irvine 11 were condemned (wow, a misdemeanor) because they were disruptive, infringing on the rights of others. They could have expressed their feeling in any other place and any other time, but no, just like Muslims everywhere, they denied others the right of free speech. How Islamic.

    Perhaps it might be that Palestinians (Muslims), Arabs (Muslims), South Asians (Muslims), and others (Mostly Muslims) are demonized and discriminated against because of the violence they do and the unending, intense hate that characterizes them and their faith. Try that on for a change, or just blame it on everybody else (jews, Israel, America, Bush, Obama, Christians, Crusaders, the media, Hollywood, racism, the West, culture, imperialism, colonialism, Bugs Bunny, lack of education, etc.). Did I miss anyone?

    It is always amusing to see Muslims complain of discrimination and persecution. It is likewise somewhat comical to see a people that loves Mohammad and considers him to be a noble example complain of others committing violence against them.

    1. Ah, “Kactuzjay,” we meet again. You’ve been on this blog plenty of times and I have allowed you to spew your racist, Islamophobic filth on several occasions.

      You know how this works.

      Sadly, it seems no matter how many times I call you out on your racism, you persist in your hate and resort to flying carpet fallacies.

      No life? I feel sorry for you. Really, I do. So much hatred in your heart that you just won’t back down. I’ve explained to you countless times before that hateful comments will no be tolerated. I then refer you to my comment policy.

      Can’t follow directions? Have nothing else to do except to go on the internet and leave a racist comment on a Muslim’s blog?


      Do you need a hug?

      1. I hope you realize, Kactuzjay, that Muslims are far from the only people who are against zionism and the wholesale invasion of Palestine by the western world. As a white person raised as a Christian, I abhor the way the Palestinians have been treated. Visit “Israel”, and see for yourself the ghettoization of the Palestinians who didn’t seek refuge in bordering countries. No person of any ethical reflection would ever support that.

      2. Thanks, Quix. There are a lot of non-Muslims and non-Arabs who speak out against Zionism. Anyone who attends Palestinian solidarity rallies, events, or meetings will see the immense diversity of the movement, which consists of many anti-Zionist Jews. Omitting Jewish and other non-Muslim voices from the discourse is the mainstream media’s attempt to reinforce an “Arab/Muslim versus Jew” narrative.

        Thanks for your comment!

  5. I really *really* do love this blog, it’s not nice to feel like a sorethumbanomalyfreakkafir in the Muslim community for having the views we do. Please, please, don’t ever stop being you.

    1. Thank you so much for your supportive comment! It really means a lot! I’m glad you feel that way about this blog and it makes a huge difference to have support like yours from the Muslim community. Thank you. 🙂

  6. You’re welcome. Just wanted to express my gratitude because every post seems to elicit either “OMG YES” or a “OMFG YES!!!” so yeah, thank *you*. 🙂

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s