Muslim-Americans Getting It Wrong on Pakistan

In no way do I support the Pakistani court’s decision to ban its citizens from accessing Facebook and YouTube. As many of you know, restrictions were put into effect after Pakistani officials learned about an idiotic, Islamophobic event on Facebook called “Draw Muhammad Day.” As much as I strongly oppose the event and find it clearly driven by hate and ignorance, I believe the Facebook ban is not only nonsensical and counterproductive, but also an insult to the Pakistani people, implying that millions of citizens would flock to the group and participate if the site is not prohibited. Without a doubt, the blockade of Facebook and YouTube represents the government’s religious insecurity and mistrust of its own people.

However, what puzzles me further is how Muslim-Americans, especially those of Pakistani descent, resort to simplified generalizations and misrepresentations of Paksitan and its citizens. I do not know Arsalan Iftikhar personally, but I have always respected his efforts to speak out against Islamophobia and distortions of Muslim-Americans. Whether on CNN or Fox News and talking to right-wing bullies like Bill O’Reilly, Mr. Iftikhar’s work certainly calls for respect and appreciation.

But I must challenge the comments he made about Pakistan in his latest piece on the CNN opinion page. Mr. Iftikhar paints a harsh picture of Pakistan in the very first sentence:

For a country that has produced five military dictators in 60 years, mourned the 2007 assassination of former Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto, and struggles continually against its own militant extremists who have killed thousands in their own nation, Pakistan has absolutely picked the wrong fight by banning Facebook and YouTube because of an idiotic virtual campaign called “Everybody Draw Mohammed Day.”

Mr. Iftikhar went further to argue that the country did not live up to its name, pointing out that the word “Pakistan” means “Land of the Pure” when translated from Urdu. “There has been nothing pure,” he writes, “about the downward sociopolitical spiral of this nuclear-armed, Third World fledgling democracy of 172 million people over the last several years.” He cites former US ambassador to Pakistan, Wendy Chamberlin, who describes the region as terrorized by extremists. Mr. Iftikhar closes with the following:

Instead of conjuring up stupid controversies like the recent bans of Facebook and YouTube because of some silly drawings, the 172 million citizens of Pakistan should focus their political attention and economic resources on educating their women, improving their rule of law system and truly understanding the repercussions that come with ominously naming your country the “land of the pure.”

I will not dispute the social, political, and economic struggles that confront Pakistan. Indeed, they are real. However, what surprises and appalls me is that there is not a single mentioning of the U.S. intervening, exploiting, and attacking Pakistan. Mr. Iftikhar’s article is titled “Pakistan should ban extremism, not Facebook,” but he does not address the root of the extremism. He only touches upon the symptoms of a larger problem. Yes, Pakistan has an unfortunate history of military dictators and while it is important to hold those leaders accountable for their criminal actions, it is also crucial to acknowledge that the US largely supported and funded those dictatorships.

When the United States was hell-bent on fighting Communism, the government subsidized General Zia ul-Haq, Pakistan’s most ruthless military dictator, who was trained in Fort Leavenworth, Kansas, and later stationed in Jordan to train soldiers during the Black September operations, which resulted in thousands of Palestinian deaths and causalities. The US-Pakistan alliance monetarily and militarily aided the Mujahedeen resistance movement in Afghanistan against Soviet invasion. Not only were extremists and militant groups supplied with US weapons and trained by the CIA, but the jihadi manuals were also printed in Nebraska.

I have repeatedly pointed this out in previous posts, but after September 11th, then President Pervez Musharraf was given an ultimatum from George W. Bush: “You’re either with us or against us.” Pakistani British author Tariq Ali has also emphasized on this next point: former US deputy secretary of state Richard Armitage threatened to “blow Pakistan back to the stone age.” Pakistan’s cooperation with the US, as well as fighting in the North Western Frontier Province (NWFP) has resulted in violent antagonism towards Pakistan from tribal groups, militants and extremists.

In other words, the war in Afghanistan is spilling into Pakistan. The invading Taliban groups view the Pakistani government as complicit with US war crimes, not just in Afghanistan, but in Iraq and Palestine as well. This has resulted in devastating attacks on Pakistan, which has caused so much suffering on the Pakistani people themselves – Sufi shrines being destroyed in Peshawar, the bombing of girl’s schools, sporadic bombings in Peshawar, Lahore and other parts of the country, etc.

President Obama, who frequently criticized the US for supporting Musharraf during the presidential campaign, is not only financially backing President Asif Zardari – a man who is reviled by the majority of Pakistanis – but also escalating troops in Afghanistan and carrying out deadly drone operations in Pakistani tribal areas. In fact, it was reported by Pakistan’s Dawn Media Group that over 700 civilians were killed by drone attacks since Obama took office in 2009. According to PressTV, an estimated 300 people (and counting) have been killed in 42 drone attacks in 2010. Not to state the obvious, but that is a lot of people! Zardari and Hamid Karzai of neighboring Afghanistan both welcome Obama’s policies in advancing the Afghan war and continuing the drone attacks, respectively.

Yet it seems that President Obama receives little to no criticism from Muslim-Americans, specifically those who are in Washington or work in civil rights organizations. I often hear peculiar arguments that seek to justify his policies. There are those who even question the number of casualties from the drone attacks (to which author and activist Jeremy Scahill has refuted). Others have argued that leaflets were sent to those areas, so all of the Pakistani civilians should just leave. Funny, because I never heard such excuses when Israel bombed Lebanon in 2006 or Gaza in December-January of 2008-2009.

The reality is that human rights violations still occur under Obama’s administration – in Iraq, in Palestine, in Afghanistan, and in Pakistan. In February, US soldiers raided an Afghan home and killed three innocent women – two of whom were pregnant – and then tried to hide the evidence by digging the bullets out of the dead bodies. Earlier this month, 20 people were killed in another drone attack in Pakistan. With such injustice, how does one expect there to be no violent backlash or retaliation at all? Do people easily forget the murders of their Loved ones?

It would be inaccurate to say extremism and corruption does not exist among certain Pakistani religious leaders and politicians, but excluding US attacks and military operations in the region would be just as misguided. As Tariq Ali has stated in several of his talks, the US presence in Afghanistan is not the solution, it is part of the problem and it is having a disastrous impact on Pakistan. Drone assaults on tribal areas only generates a culture of revenge, intensifies the violence, and endangers the lives of Pakistanis, as well as Americans (see: Time Square).

Extremism does not manifest out of thin air. Ignoring the US as a key factor is a misrepresentation of facts and simplifies the radicalization of extremists and militant groups (similar to how Bush advocates used to say, “They hate us because we’re free”).

Not all of the 172 million Pakistani citizens support the ban on Facebook and YouTube. I would argue that the vast majority of Pakistanis object to it – and I base this on the nation-wide demonstrations that helped reinstate the chief justice Iftikhar Chaudhary, as well as the gathering of over one hundred thousand people who observed the 250th anniversary of the divinely inspired 17th century Sufi poet, Bulleh Shah. Though I doubt Mr. Iftikhar was implying that 172 million Pakistanis weren’t doing anything about educating women and improving their ruling systems, I think it was unfair that he didn’t mention their efforts.

As for Pakistan not living up to its name, “Land of the Pure,” I cannot really disagree with Arsalan Iftikhar. However, I must ask: which country is, if any? Which country in the world is the shining example of justice and liberty for all? Sure, there is enough to criticize about the “Land of the Pure,” but let’s not dismiss the facts, the US-Pakistan relationships, the dynamics of power, and the deadly repercussions of military intervention and exploitation.

And surely, that turns our attention to the problems we have here in the “Land of the Free.”

11 thoughts on “Muslim-Americans Getting It Wrong on Pakistan

  1. Excellently argued and cited – I agree very much, and there is a similar tendency amongst Iranians who are quick to criticize Iran and Iranian culture while ignoring the pernicious influence of imperialist powers on Iranian affairs. We absolutely should criticize our countries, politics, and cultures, but as you say, we must examine the root causes, and very often those roots are planted not in Pakistani or Iranian soil, but in the heart of the U.S.

    This may be your best post yet, Jehanzeb!

  2. The court banned Facebook at the request of a petition by a citizens’ “Islamic Lawyers Movement”, as well as by many other groups throughout the country. Students from universities have been staging protests in every major city against Facebook.

    Aside from a handful of teens, most of Pakistan is fully behind the Facebook ban. Many people here are advocating that people deactivate their accounts permanently once the ban comes off because simply blocking the group for one country isn’t enough. It violate’s Facebook’s own policies on hate speech and should be removed permanently (along with other groups, not only targeted at Muslims).

    Can’t say the same for the YouTube ban… there were no requests to have that banned and nobody knew there was anything going on there with this event, not to mention YouTube has so much positive Islamic content.

  3. Mr. Iftikhar paints a harsh picture of Pakistan in the very first sentence:

    None of which is disputable, given it’s all truth; because Pakistan relies on hadiths that need be overthrown.

    Truth is one thing you Muslims seem to ignore. You have existed for centuries as a brutal religion (a religion that’s easily subverted to brutality by ‘extremists’ who only follow the laws, hadiths, that are written by crazy Imams to subvert much of the Qur’an) that needs the sort of modernization and reformation that Christianity went through hundreds, a thousand years ago. When various crazy Imams are allowed to construct these bad hadiths that easily call for violence against others, for whatever reason, it’s time to restrict such idiots from their religious practices.

    That’s where you’ve failed, and miserably. Your voices of ‘Change’ are weak; weak and easily ignored by those who desire no change.

    It’s the easily manipulated flaws in the book written by Mohammed, I believe. The Qur’an is treacherous work that needs to be re-written.

    Handle that, and you’ll be welcomed to the 21st Century.

  4. You obviously came to this blog with an agenda. And by insulting the Prophet (peace be upon him) and Islam, it seems clear that you’re not even interested in establishing friendships with Muslims. Even though you violated the guidelines in my comment policy, I’m going to leave your comment here just so people can see how ugly Islamophobia is.


  5. I agree with Usman’s compliment to your moderating skills.

    My email accounts were hacked as I explained in a new post on my blog

    Email Accounts Hacked!

    I will get back with a more substantive comment on this excellent post which I have read, but want to read again before commenting more.

  6. When I read this piece from Arsalan I made the same point to him in an e-mail. Arsalan perpetuates the myth that extremism is a purely religious problem, not a political problem. Far from helping counter Islamophobia, he actually furthered it by his simple stereotyping of the complex situation in Pakistan. There is no amount of religious reform that can deradicalize someone whose life and family was destroyed by a done strike. Extremism is caused by political problems that need political solutions. I’m tired of hearing how Islam needs to be reformed when its US policy that needs to be reformed.

    Thank you for the excellent rebuttal.

  7. This is a very good argument.

    One of the major problems that seems to confront Pakistan in the West is the fact that the powers that be tend to willingly hide their atrocities against Pakistani civilians (drone bombings, financial support of dictators, et cetera) from the public. They simply whine and cry crocodile tears about how Pakistan is “not doing its part” or is “a two-faced ally” in the egregiously named “war on terror”. When, of course, Pakistan has lost thousands of people and Pakistanis are subjected to the loss of loved ones, to personal injury, and to fear of death, because their government has been bought out in the name of supporting this supposed “war on terror”. Pakistan has been given a bad rep, when in all honesty it is our own countries that are most deserving of reprimand for the injustices they commit against Pakistan.

    It is sickening to see how much the West double-deals on Pakistan. And as your other commentators have noted, extremism is bred by pain and loss, not by religious scriptures. The drone strikes cause far, far, more damage than they “solve” and greatly exasperate what has always been a nightmare.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s