Christopher Columbus: The Heroification of a Mass Murderer

In most American history classrooms, children are taught that in 1492, Christopher Columbus sailed the ocean blue and “discovered America.”  In this narrative, Columbus is portrayed as an adventurous explorer and a national hero.  It is a narrative that is profoundly romanticized and even mythical, yet despite the historical records and accounts of Columbus’s heinous crimes against indigenous peoples, he is still glorified and honored in American history and culture.

Heroificiation, as defined by author James W. Loewen, is a “degenerative process” that distorts reality and transforms “flesh-and-blood individuals into pious, perfect creatures without conflicts, pain, credibility, or human interest.”  Christopher Columbus represents but one example in human history where an individual responsible for some of the most dreadful atrocities in our human history is molded into a savior-like figure and commemorated with a national holiday.  It is disturbing how most American schoolchildren learn from history teachers and textbooks to not only venerate Columbus, but also to recite poems, sing songs, and perform in romanticized reenactments about his arrival to the Americas.  These praises, accompanied with “Columbus Day” celebrations and parades, grossly gloss over the horrors of American Indian genocide initiated by Columbus’s expeditions.

American public schools rarely discuss Columbus’s atrocities. As Corine Fairbanks points out:

Recently, Roberta Weighill, Chumash, shared that her third grade son disagreed with his teacher about the Columbus discovery story and added that he knew Columbus to be responsible for the deaths of many Native people.  The public teacher corrected him: “No. Columbus was just a slave trader.” Hmmm, just a slave trader? Oh! Is that all?

American history textbooks paint Columbus as a hero by treating his voyages into the “oceanic unknown” as exceptional and unique, as if he was the only explorer who ever journeyed to the Americas.  Aside from the fact that indigenous peoples already lived in the land we now call the United States and weren’t waiting to be “discovered,” Columbus was not the first to set sail to the Americas.  In his book, “Lies My Teacher Told Me,” Loewen provides a chronological list of expeditions that reached the Americas prior to Columbus, including explorers from Siberia, Indonesia, Japan, Afro-Phoenicia, Portugal, among other countries.  Most of the eighteen high school history textbooks surveyed by Loewen omit the factors that prompted Columbus’s voyage in the first place: social change in Europe, advancement in military technology, use of the printing press – which allowed information to travel faster and further into Europe – and the ideological and theological rationalization for conquering new land.   For example, Columbus’s greed and pursuit of gold in Haiti is either extremely downplayed or absent in textbooks.  Columbus himself aligned amassing wealth with salvation, writing:  “Gold is most excellent; gold constitutes treasure; and he who has it does all he wants in the world, and can even lift souls up to Paradise.”  Accompanying Columbus on his 1494 expedition to Haiti was Michele de Cuneo, who wrote the following account:

After we had rested for several days in our settlement it seemed to the Lord Admiral that it was time to put into execution his desire to search for gold, which was the main reason he had started on so great a voyage full of so many dangers.

In elementary school, I remember learning that Columbus was peaceful to the indigenous people, who were in turn friendly and welcoming of the Spaniards.  If anything was mentioned about war, it was always presented as, “There were good people and bad people on both sides.”  Such an explanation shamelessly ignores the fact that “over 95 million indigenous peoples throughout the Western hemisphere were enslaved, mutilated and massacred.”  The myth that Native Americans and Europeans were equally responsible for gruesome brutality was also reinforced in Disney’s animated feature, “Pocahontas.”  The film placed Native American resistance and European violence on the same plane, i.e. the extremists on “both sides” made it bad for those who wanted peace, and colonialist domination and power was not a contributing factor to any form of resistance from the Natives.  This distortion of history often likes to behave as sympathetic to Native Americans, but what it actually does is consistently depict them as “inferior” and “backwards,” while lionizing European colonizers and settlers, as well as constructing a history that is complimentary to the nationalism and pro-Americanism preached in most American schools.

I don’t think I would have learned about what Columbus really did if I didn’t start reading about Islamic history, which, too, was either ignored or vilified (especially during lessons on the Crusades) in my history classes.  1492, the same year Columbus sailed to the Americas, was also the year of the Spanish Inquisition, when Jews and Muslims were forced to convert or leave the country.  The Catholic reconquest of Spain – the Reconquista – by King Ferdinand II and Queen Isabella heightened interest in expanding European Christian domination, which led to their eventual agreement to sponsor Columbus’s voyage.

Upon his arrival to the Bahamas, Columbus and his sailors were greeted by Arawak men and women.  Columbus wrote of them in his log:

They … brought us parrots and balls of cotton and spears and many other things, which they exchanged for the glass beads and hawks’ bells. They willingly traded everything they owned… They were well-built, with good bodies and handsome features…. They do not bear arms, and do not know them, for I showed them a sword, they took it by the edge and cut themselves out of ignorance. They have no iron. Their spears are made of cane… . They would make fine servants…. With fifty men we could subjugate them all and make them do whatever we want.

Worth noting is how Columbus’s description of the Arawak correlates with his sense of European entitlement and superiority.  In several accounts, he praised the Arawak and other indigenous tribes for being hospitable, handsome, and intelligent, but not without saying they would make “fine servants.”  When Columbus justified enslavement and his wars against the Natives, he vilified them as “cruel,” “stupid,” and “a people warlike and numerous, whose customs and religion are very different from ours.”

It is also important to understand the genocide of indigenous people could not have been possible without racism and sexual violence. Indigenous scholar and feminist-activist Andrea Smith cites Ann Stoler’s analysis of racism to illustrate the relationship between sexual violence and colonialism: “Racism is not an effect but a tactic in the internal fission of society into binary opposition, a means of creating ‘biologized’ internal enemies, against whom society must defend itself.”  Racism marks the “other” as “inherently dirty,” and subsequently “inherently rapable.”  For this reason, Smith argues that sexual violence is a weapon of patriarchy and colonialism, as opposed to being a separate issue altogether:

Because Indian bodies are “dirty,” they are considered sexually violable and “rapable,” and the rape of bodies that are considered inherently impure or dirty simply does not count. For instance, prostitutes are almost never believed when they say they have been raped because the dominant society considers the bodies of sex workers undeserving of integrity and violable at all times. Similarly, the history of mutilation of Indian bodies, both living and dead, makes it clear that Indian people are not entitled to bodily integrity.

Sexual violence and degradation of Native bodies is evident in how Columbus used Taino women as sex slaves and sexual rewards for his men.  Columbus profited off of sex-slave trade by exporting them to other parts of the world.  In fact, most of his income came from slavery.  In 1500, he wrote to a friend:  “A hundred castellanoes (a Spanish coin) are as easily obtained for a woman as for a farm, and it is very general and there are plenty of dealers who go about looking for girls; those from nine to ten (years old) are now in demand.”

During an online conversation, some defended Columbus by arguing he was only carrying out the “norms of his time.” Justifying Columbus’s actions by the “standards” of his time, or through historical moral relativism, is problematic, not only because it dismisses genocide, sex slavery, and land theft, but also because it suggests there are overall honorable traits about Columbus and that he should be commemorated.  For instance, Bartolome de las Casas, the Spanish-born Dominican Bishop of Chiapas, witnessed and documented the horrors of Columbus’s subjugation, enslavement, and massacre of indigenous people. He is often quoted for writing:

What we committed in the Indies stands out among the most unpardonable offenses ever committed against God and humankind and this trade [in American Indian slaves] as one of the most unjust, evil, and cruel among them.

In numerous accounts, de las Casas reports about Columbus commanding his men to cut off the legs of children who would run away; about Spaniards hunting and killing Natives for sport; about colonialists testing the sharpness of their blades on living, breathing Native bodies; about Columbus’s men placing bets on who would cut a person in half in a single sweep of their swords. De las Casas wrote:  “Such inhumanities and barbarisms were committed in my sight as no age can parallel. My eyes have seen these acts so foreign to human nature that now I tremble as I write.”

[UPDATE 10/13/2014] It is important to note that by no means am I romanticizing de las Casas here nor would I suggest that Columbus Day should be replaced with “Bartolomé Day,” as this well-intentioned, though extremely problematic essay on The Oatmeal advocates. As Tria Andrews writes in her brilliant critique of the essay:

Although “Christopher Columbus was awful” is perhaps well intentioned, the logics guiding the essay’s trajectory are nevertheless harmful to Indigenous peoples, whose own struggles for recognition and sovereignty are entirely excluded from the discourse, and African Americans, whose enslavement and humanity are superficially gestured to, but ultimately ignored.

The essay is flawed in its inability to understand that there is no need to substitute Columbus Day with “bart-oh-low-may-day,” since Indigenous People’s Day, an international event of counter-resistance to Columbus Day, already exists.

Andrews points out that de las Casas “himself was a slave owner and temporarily supported the enslavement of African Americans.” Although de las Casas’s views changed over time, his advocacy of indigenous rights and ending slavery was motivated by his desire to “convert and baptize the ‘heathen’ Indians.”  In his debate with Juan Gines de Supulveda, who argued that the Natives were “barbarians” and predisposed to slavery, de las Casas argued that they were intelligent and capable of attaining salvation in Christianity without coercion.

Andrews points out that when we recognize the brutal atrocities of Columbus, but then praise another colonial figure, this “reinforces the false notion that Indigenous peoples need outsiders as protectors.” When people celebrate figures like de las Casas as “champions” of human rights, what does it say about the voices of Native Americans, especially those who live today and continue to struggle against genocide? In her conclusion, Andrews states:

Although de las Casas’s personal and political transformations are important, the solution to the violence of Columbus Day is far more complex than replacing Columbus Day with de las Casas Day. If mainstream histories view de las Casas as “one of the first advocates for universal human rights,” we might begin by asking who is constructing “universal human rights,” and how? Who has access? And whose perspectives are we foregrounding?

Each year, I hear people make the argument that Columbus and de las Casas cannot be “judged by today’s standards.” When these arguments are made, we need to seriously question and challenge what “today’s standards” are. Inherit in the romantic mythology of Columbus’s heroism is the white supremacist heteropatriarchal imperialism that colonizes, exploits, and unleashes massacres and sexual violence upon people in Afghanistan, Iraq, Palestine, and in parts of the world like Pakistan where war eerily operates as if there is no war, despite US military presence, airbases, drone assaults, political intervention, etc.  Entire peoples are being vilified, demonized; their histories distorted, omitted; and indigenous peoples continue to resist and struggle against ongoing genocide that seeks to exterminate them. It is the logic of genocide, as Smith reminds us, that insists Native peoples must fade into nonexistence. War criminals are still glorified; war crimes are still justified; inhumane practices against humanity are still occurring.

The Reconsider Columbus Day effort challenges the status quo, not just for the sake of restoring dignity and honesty to human history, but also for eradicating tyranny, colonialism, and imperialism that exists in the present.  When American schoolchildren are taught to identify with Columbus, they are aligning themselves with an oppressor and making a racial distinction between “us” and “them.”   The point of dismantling the way we celebrate and honor Columbus goes beyond exposing Columbus’s personality, it’s about taking responsibility for the ways we are complicit in reinforcing the logic of genocide. It’s about decolonizing ourselves in order to bring about radical, revolutionary change to society.

Decolonize for the sake of today, and for the sake of tomorrow.

28 thoughts on “Christopher Columbus: The Heroification of a Mass Murderer

  1. Great post! I was wondering how I knew much of this, and focusing on having read Barolome de las Casas early on, but in fact the best explanation is the difference in what is taught in primary schools in Canada and the US.

    Canadian schools taught me about Columbus only as one of others, especially the Viking settlements on the east coast of Canada which preceded him by centuries, and the Siberian migration, as well as the other attempts for a passage to India, and those which followed Columbus. We also studied the abuses of Indians, including using them as mercenaries, paying them in rum, bringing small pox and measles, etc.

    Canada lacks the superpatriotism that is common in the US, and we don’t have the same approach to our own history or to how it is taught.

    I think there are benefits to the US curriculum of including civics and pride, but there need to be correctives to the content, including contextualizing US history more within international history.

    • Stephen Poole says:

      I live in Pennsylvania and the two different schools I have gone to have both discredited many of the myths about Columbus and we have also learned of his genocide and enslavement of the Arawak’s. In fact my AP history teacher this year actually had us read a chapter from the book you mentioned, lies my history teacher told me. I am currently writing a paper on why Columbus day should be abolished and have been looking for credible sources on Columbus. Do not worry people of the world not everyone in America is ignorant of what Columbus did.

      • No one implied that “everyone in America is ignorant of what Columbus did.” In fact, indigenous people who are living in what is called the “United States” certainly aren’t ignorant of it.

        But let’s not pretend that Columbus is celebrated institutionally. After all, he has a holiday reserved for him.

        That’s great the schools are discrediting Columbus and the myths about him. We need to continue speaking up!

  2. Thank you for this post. I remember when I was in the eighth grade, I was fortunate enough to have a history teacher who taught that Christopher Columbus wasn’t a hero. But talked about his brutality towards indigenous populations. As well as teaching us that it wasn’t Columbus who discovered America, but there were many others who did before him.

    I think a lot of schools are resistant towards teaching about this, also whenever these discussions come up, the ones who defend Columbus’s actions are very quick to say “well the indigenous people were just as violent and just as brutal, blah, blah.”

    • It’s great to hear some history teachers are being honest about Columbus. I think being honest about history is a huge step forward. And yeah, I can’t stand the argument that they were “both bad” or that “there are extremists on both sides.”

  3. Excellent post. One thing I found interesting is that Columbus’ first written encounter with the Arawak suggests that the Arawak had traded with foreign people previously.

    I really can’t wait for the day that Columbus loses this hero status that has been given to him.

  4. unsettledsoul says:

    I graduated high school in 1999, and curriculum was already changing to support a more fair and unbiased view of what Columbus really was doing.

    Of course, when most teachers in most suburban schools are White, then you can see a bit of White guilt happening as far as telling the whole story about people of color and Whites, historically. You can always tell how horrible a high school does at teaching diversity and history from a non-eurocentric point of view, when White kids in college courses are still arguing about whether or not there is still racism in America. I went to UW-Madison, a majority White college in Wisconsin, and my diversity classes were always filled with White guilt, and a denial of White privilege that I felt should have been learned about and explored wayyyy before college. Instead of being able to delve into deep and complicated issues we had to stay at the surface issues because so many White kids needed their hands held in order to accept and learn about historical truths and current issues in regards to the treatment of people of color in this country.
    So yea, in many suburbs and small towns Columbus may not be a hero, but he also isn’t seen as a raider and enslaver either.

    Interesting enough is how Whites are once again painting their history in dark and ominous shades in regards to the treatment and stereotyping of Muslims. For example, the conservative party in American politics and the sprouting of the tea party. It will be interesting to see what their legacy is for future generations.

    Guess we never learn, huh? lol

    • That’s a good point. History repeats itself, as they say. That’s also interesting about Columbus, about how he’s not treated as a hero or a raider in some towns. Sounds like the discourse is watered down so that it could “work for everyone.”

  5. Jazakallah for such an informative post. I’m reminded of a fictional book: Noughts and Crosses penned by Malorie Blackman, she subverts the role of whites & blacks in her novel & shows how regardless of the colour of the oppressor, racism still prevails, I strongly recommend it.

  6. mariam says:

    thank you for writting this post.it is very interesting and eye opening.I am in wonder why I havenot heard other side of Columbus in my country?
    mariam-Iran

      • mariam says:

        we have just heard that he was a great adventurer.if you search about him in Frasi in google you cant find so many negative views toward him.it is shame.
        mariam-Iran

  7. Sara says:

    Let me start off by mentioning how ironic the automatically generated “Possible related posts” are. “Celebrate Columbus Day” ha!

    I remember having to draw pictures of Columbus to celebrate his “accomplishments” when I was younger. It wasn’t until I was much older that I learned he wasn’t the hero I was told he was. It’s amazing the amount of power history books have in shaping perceptions.

    Unfortunately, I live in Texas and in May they voted to adopt a social studies curriculum that is way more conservative-positive. Fortunately, I’m in college now and I’m taking a history class with a teacher that tells us things that haven’t been given much attention. Columbus’ atrocities were among some of the first things she told us. Even so, some of the things you talked about like sex slavery were news to me. I think what the Reconsider Columbus Day site is missing is accounts like these that paint the picture of the real Christopher Columbus.

    • lol, it is ironic, isn’t it? I’m sure someone who celebrates Columbus Day gets an automatically generated link to my blog post, haha.

      That’s interesting you had to draw pictures of Columbus. I remember reenactments and reciting poems at my school. I grew up in a conservative area and I’m sure the discourse on Columbus hasn’t changed.

      I’m glad this post informed you about things you didn’t know about before. Thanks for commenting. :)

  8. Great post.

    There are many things out there that make me angry…but probably one of the biggest is the idea that it’s “good” to lie to our youth and water down the facts of history. History isn’t pretty, people deserve to know these facts. Christopher Columbus is someone students probably shouldn’t learn about until middle school or high school (due to the disturbing nature of what he did). He should certainly not be treated as a hero.

  9. Sufyan says:

    Excellent article my friend and I completely agree with your article, and this needs to be brought to light with the rest of the American public. bravo brother

    ps: other than columbus the only other group of people that tried to colonize the new world is the Vikings when they came to newfoundland in canada. other than those two no other civilization has any proof of their involvement in coming to America, at least no actual evidence to support it.

  10. A fascinating and utterly sobering post for anyone interested in the truth, not just the myths we are taught in school in a white-centric curriculum. Thank you :)

    Ya Haqq!

  11. Anthony says:

    I enjoy your approach to this history, though to the credit of my US education I had heard most of it before. I would be interested in learning about other heroified villains.

    For instance St. Patrick, who brought Christianity to Ireland, through sometimes brutal tactics. I have a pagan friend who celebrates “St. Patrick’s Day” as “Forgiving St. Patrick Day”

    I’m sure there are numerous other Saints, some perhaps crusaders, who are even more undeserving of their beatification.

    Who would be on your list of history’s greatest villains?

  12. Erin says:

    Great article! Being quarter Native and having a 2nd grader i’m extremely angered by the school department’s disregard to CHANGE history books!! This is why the American people are some of the stupidest people on the globe!! (yes, i’m american, but i refuse to remain ignorant or raise my child that way) And they don’t even know it!!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s